There are three major categories of roles we need to consider here namely to c users to B users and to G users I think To G users have the least to say Basically they have to meet whatever requirements the government puts forward If we refer to the development history of electric vehicle charging piles a unified docking and unified supervision platform such as interconnection may appear in the future As far as I know many current protocol standards for twowheeled vehicle charging piles are actually not standardized If there are such requirements it will probably be a relatively big challenge for many manufacturers with weak development capabilities
To C I think it is probably the most satisfied among these three Brazil WhatsApp Number Data types of users If we talk about the biggest demand I think it is lower price In fact this demand may be somewhat contradictory to the TO B users demand for higher income Therefore there may be some chaos in uneven tariffs To B here mainly refers to the venue and the operator The bottom line of the venue is the safety of the product currently the larger manufacturers on the market will basically not have problems on this point On this basis I think the most core requirement is probably higher income The operators basically have this demand In addition some small selfemployed operators may also
have some needs for functions such as generating financial bills tax returns and invoicing To sum up one focus of future product development may be how to balance the interests of ordinary users venues and operators Based on the consideration that everyone wants to obtain more benefits I think what is likely to happen in the future is that some operators roles will be absorbed by the venues selfoperated manufacturers may have the possibility of losing profits in the future of product may be more popular with both To C and To B users in the future It may be products that can bring more benefits to users.
發表於 2024-3-12 11:52:55
